• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Online Consultation
  • Make a Payment LawPay
  • 757-460-3477

Bonney, Allenberg, O’Reilly, & Eddy, P.C.

Legal Assistance for Federal Employees

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Practice Overview
    • Federal Employee EEO Discrimination
    • Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) Appeals
    • Grievances/Arbitrations
    • OSC Appeals
    • Whistleblower Protection
    • Federal Disability Retirement
    • Security Clearance Revocation
  • Attorney Profiles
    • Neil C. Bonney
    • Charles H. Allenberg
    • Laura A. O’Reilly
    • Allison B. Eddy
    • Cameron A. Bonney Evans
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Administrative v. Criminal Investigations

Nov 01, 2016

Administrative v. Criminal Investigations

The question is when is an investigation purely administrative and when is it a criminal investigation. Most federal employees are aware that they must participate in agency investigations whether they want to or not. Most federal employees also know they have a constitutional right not to self-incriminate. The problem is knowing when is an administrative investigation only administrative and when does it become a criminal investigation.

An interview may start out as an administrative interview then change into a criminal interview. Another possibility is that during an administrative interview, facts may be disclosed which will later be used to conduct a criminal investigation. The possibilities and situations are virtually unlimited. Therefore the first and most important thing to do is ask for a Union Representative.

Let’s look at a scenario as it unfolds to show the dangers of a simple administrative investigation. Someone other than a bargaining unit employee, say a contractor, was seen allegedly stealing something and the agency wants to find out if the bargaining unit employee (BUE) saw anything. The BUE is questioned and says no, he didn’t see anything because he was working with Joe Blow over in Building C that day. Come to find out, Joe Blow says he was not with him that day. Now the employee has possibly submitted a false statement, and may also be charged with being off of the job site without permission. The investigator/officer may also jump to the conclusion that since the employee lied about his whereabouts, maybe he was involved in the theft with the contractor. The employee is then brought in for further questioning and it turns out the employee wasn’t at work at all that day but falsified his time card. He now has the above charge of submitting a false statement and falsifying his time card. So a case which started out as having nothing to do with the employee now leads to a proposed removal. By the way, fraud against the United States (submitting false attendance cards and receiving funds) can then be criminally prosecuted. Wow! That went from nothing, to a removal and criminal prosecution in a flash.

So what to do? First, call a Union Representative. The Union Representative can help you recognize potential problems and/or issues.

Second, ask the reason for the interview.

Third, ask if it is a criminal interview. If they say no, don’t take their word for it. If they give you a statement that says it is only administrative, ask them for an agreement of immunity from the U. S. Attorney’s Office. After all, only the U. S. Attorney can provide you immunity.

Finally, don’t talk too much and think about your answer. It is perfectly acceptable to say you do not remember rather than risk giving incorrect information.

Categories: Uncategorized

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Categories

  • Federal Employment
  • MSPB
  • Uncategorized

Tags

arbitration Clean Record Collective Bargaining congressional inquiry consultation COVID-19 COVID19 disability disability retirement disciplinary action DoD CAF DoDCAF drug testing EEO EO13836 EO13837 EO13839 EO13950 EO13957 EO14003 Executive Order failure to follow instructions federal employment federal employment law federal employment lawyer federal law FERS FLRA insubordination marijuana MSPB OPM reasonable accommodation religion Retaliation retirement security clearance Settlement suspension Union Unions vaccine VA employee whistleblower disclosure whistleblower retaliation

Footer

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Disability Retirement Considerations for Federal Employees

Federal employees who find themselves in the unfortunate situation of being medically unable to continue performing the essential functions of their positions may be eligible for a disability retirement through their government retirement system.  Generally speaking, federal employees covered by the Read More

OPM Finalizes Recission of Trump-Era Restrictions on Clean-Record Settlements

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) recently issued its final regulations rescinding many of former President Trump’s orders impacting federal employees, including the restriction on entering clean-record settlements that had been included in former President Trump’s Executive Order 13839.  Read More

Social Media

FacebookLinkedin

Bonney, Allenberg, O’Reilly, & Eddy, P.C.
4854 Haygood Rd., Suite 200 | Virginia Beach, VA 23455 | 757-460-3477

© 2012-2023 Bonney, Allenberg, O’Reilly, & Eddy, P.C. All Rights Reserved.
Virginia Beach Website Design by CDG.

Professional Affiliations

  • National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA)
  • Virginia State Bar (VSB)
LawPay button
Cleantalk Pixel
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkNo