• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Online Consultation
  • 757-460-3477

Bonney, Allenberg, O’Reilly, & Eddy, P.C.

Legal Assistance for Federal Employees

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Practice Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
You are here: Home / Federal Employment / A Suspension By Another Name Is Still A Suspension

Feb 04, 2016

A Suspension By Another Name Is Still A Suspension

Sometimes, federal agencies will place an employee out of work without pay against the will of the employee. This happens primarily in situations where the employee has been suspended from work for any host of reasons, usually involving some finding of misconduct by the employer. In the federal government, most civil service employees cannot be suspended unless and until they are provided with due process – namely, written notice of a proposed disciplinary action and an opportunity to respond orally and in writing to that proposed disciplinary action.

However, in some circumstances, the employing agency will effectively suspend an employee by placing him or her out of work without pay, but will not call the action a “suspension.” When an Agency makes an employee choose between using her paid leave or being carried in a Leave Without Pay (LWOP) or Absent Without Leave (AWOL) status, it is called “enforced leave.”

In Pittman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 832 F.2d 598 (Fed. Cir. 1987), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that an agency placing an employee on enforced leave due to a medical condition constituted an appealable suspension of more than fourteen (14) days. More recently, in Abbott v. U.S. Postal Service, 121 MSPR 294 (2014), the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) confirmed the longstanding ruling from Pittman that an agency’s placement of an employee on enforced leave for more than 14 days constitutes a suspension that can be appealed to the MSPB.

Even more recently, in Martin v. U.S. Postal Service, 2016 MSPB 6 (2016), the Postal Service placed an employee in a Leave Without Pay (LWOP) status without her consent for a retroactive period of time, which the MSPB found to be an appealable suspension action. Because the Agency had never given the employee notice of a proposed suspension and an opportunity to respond, the MSPB reversed the LWOP status entirely by finding that the Agency suspended the employee without due process.

In cases like Abbott and Martin, the employing agency did not necessarily refer to the employment actions it took against those employees as being “suspensions,” but the MSPB still found that the Agency had effectively suspended the employees, requiring the Agency to carry the same burden of proof and provide the same due process guarantees as are required in any other suspension of greater than 14 days. (Suspensions for 14 days or less are typically not appealable to the MSPB.)

If you have been involuntarily placed out of work without pay and would like to discuss your situation with an attorney, please call the law firm of Bonney, Allenberg, & O’Reilly, P.C. to set up an initial consultation with one of our attorneys.

Categories: Federal Employment, MSPB, Uncategorized

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Categories

  • Federal Employment
  • MSPB
  • Uncategorized

Tags

American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 arbitration congressional inquiry COVID-19 COVID19 disability disciplinary action discipline DoD CAF DoDCAF drug testing EEO EEO complaint emergency leave enforced leave EO13836 EO13837 EO13839 EO13950 EO13957 Executive Order failure to follow instructions federal employment federal employment law federal employment lawyer federal law FLRA grievance indefinite suspension insubordination marijuana MSPB reasonable accommodation religion Retaliation security clearance suspension Union Unions vaccine VA employee whistleblower disclosure whistleblower retaliation

Footer

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

After More than 5 Years, the MSPB Finally has a Quorum

At long last, on March 4, 2022, quorum was finally restored to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). The MSPB plays an important role in safeguarding the federal merit systems.  Generally speaking, most non-probationary Appropriated Fund federal employees of the Executive Branch are Read More

COVID-19 Vaccination Requirement for Federal Employees

On September 9, 2021, the White House announced that federal employees and contractors would be required to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in the wake of the ongoing pandemic, with exceptions only as required by federal law.  President Biden signed an Executive Order requiring each Executive Read More

Social Media

FacebookLinkedin

Bonney, Allenberg, O’Reilly, & Eddy, P.C.
4854 Haygood Rd., Suite 200 | Virginia Beach, VA 23455 | 757-460-3477

© 2012-2022 Bonney, Allenberg, O’Reilly, & Eddy, P.C. All Rights Reserved.
Virginia Beach Website Design by CDG.

Professional Affiliations

  • National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA)
  • Virginia State Bar (VSB)
Cleantalk Pixel